Exploring Young Adults’ Commitment to Cultural Heritage: A Rasch Scale Validation Study
{{brizy_dc_image_alt entityId=

Evaluating Young Adults' Engagement with Cultural Heritage

The recent article published in Heritage by Manuele Veggi, Alessandro von Gal, Laura Piccardi, Sofia Pescarin, and Raffaella Nori titled "How Much Do We Care About Cultural Heritage? A Rasch Scale Validation Study Among Young Adults", investigates the relationship between citizens and cultural heritage through the novel Cultural Heritage Caring Assessment Scale (CHARE).

Introduction to the CHARE Scale

The CHARE scale was developed to address the lack of suitable assessment tools in visitor studies. This tool is based on the Rasch model and features a 16-item questionnaire designed to measure visitors' "caring behaviors."

Validation and Practical Implications

Tested on young adults, statistical analysis confirms the model's reliability. While further validation is needed, CHARE already provides a practical means for museum professionals to assess young visitors' engagement and caring attitudes toward cultural heritage.

Study and Tool Development

The study involved existing literature and expert focus groups to develop a preliminary questionnaire. The aim was to create a reliable tool to assess interest and attention toward cultural assets by visitors.

Findings and Future Developments

Preliminary results show high potential for CHARE in enhancing visitor engagement strategies in museums and educational policies. This study serves as a starting point for further research and refinement of the scale.


More from the Blog

{{brizy_dc_image_alt entityId=
How Reasoning Style Influences the Attribution of Intentionality
How Reasoning Style Influences the Attribution of Intentionality A recent article published in Cognitive Processing by researchers Nicola Matteucci Armandi Avogli Trotti, Micaela Maria Zucchelli, Andrea Pavan, Laura Piccardi, and Raffaella Nori explores the deep connection between our reasoning style and how we attribute intentionality to others, especially in morally ambiguous situations. Link to the official article: […]
{{brizy_dc_image_alt entityId=
How the Brain Judges Harm: The Neuroscience Behind Moral Evaluation
Evaluating the actions of others is a complex cognitive process. It requires us to seamlessly integrate a person's underlying intentions with the actual outcomes they produce. But how exactly does the brain distinguish between a deliberate attack and a mere accident? A groundbreaking new article titled "How the brain judges harm: functional networks among intentional and […]
{{brizy_dc_image_alt entityId=
Environmental cognitive load and spatial anxiety: What matters in navigation?
It is now online the final published version of the Article “Environmental cognitive load and spatial anxiety: What matters in navigation?” by Raffaella Nori, Micaela Maria Zucchelli, Massimiliano Palmiero and Laura Piccardi published in Journal of Environmental Psychology. In the present study we explored the mediating role of anxiety (spatial, trait and state) in the […]
Scroll to Top